How to replace arlo with fully local cameras
Replace Arlo with local cameras and Home Assistant for full control and privacy.
Last updated: 2026-05-22
If you’re looking to ditch Arlo and build a smart home that’s fully local, you’re not alone. Many users are moving away from cloud-based systems like Arlo due to privacy concerns, dependency on internet connectivity, and the lack of full control over their data. This guide walks through how to replace Arlo with fully local cameras, with a focus on Home Assistant, but also touch on HomeKit and Hubitat where relevant.
Why Replace Arlo With Local Cameras?
Arlo is a popular security camera system, but it comes with several drawbacks. The primary issue is that it relies heavily on the cloud for storage, processing, and alerts. This means your data is stored on third-party servers, and you’re dependent on the Arlo service being available. If you’re building a local-first smart home, you’ll want to avoid this dependency.
Local cameras, on the other hand, process and store data on your own network. This gives you full control over your data, improves reliability, and reduces latency. When using Home Assistant, you can integrate local cameras with other devices and automate your home without relying on external services.
Choose the Right Local Camera for Your Setup
When replacing Arlo, the first step is to select a camera that can work with your existing infrastructure. There are several options that integrate well with Home Assistant, and many of them support local storage via NAS or internal storage.
Option 1: Amcrest IP8M-2496E
The Amcrest IP8M-2496E is a great choice for local storage. It supports both local and cloud storage, but you can configure it to store footage on a NAS or an internal drive. This camera is compatible with Home Assistant via MQTT and supports motion detection.
If you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option, the Amcrest AD-110 is a good alternative. It’s a basic IP camera that can be integrated into Home Assistant and supports local storage.
Option 2: Reolink Argus 4 Pro
The Reolink Argus 4 Pro is another excellent choice. It supports local storage and has advanced features like motion detection, night vision, and two-way audio. It can be integrated into Home Assistant via MQTT and is compatible with both Home Assistant and HomeKit.
Option 3: Third-Reality Smart Camera
The Third-Reality Smart Camera is a newer option that supports local storage and integrates well with Home Assistant. It’s a bit more expensive than some alternatives, but it offers high-quality video and good integration with local systems.
Set Up Your Local Camera with Home Assistant
Once you’ve selected your camera, the next step is to integrate it with Home Assistant. Here’s how you can do it:
1. Connect the Camera to Your Network
Ensure your camera is connected to your local Wi-Fi network. Most modern cameras will allow you to set up a local network connection through their web interface.
2. Install the Camera in Home Assistant
Home Assistant supports a variety of camera integrations. For IP cameras, you can use the Camera integration and enter the camera’s IP address and port. For cameras that support MQTT, you can use the MQTT Camera integration.
3. Configure Local Storage
If your camera supports local storage, configure it to save footage to a local NAS or internal drive. This will ensure that your data remains private and is not stored on third-party servers.
Use HomeKit or Hubitat for Additional Integration
If you’re using HomeKit or Hubitat, you can also integrate your local cameras into those ecosystems. For example, the Apple HomePod mini can act as a speaker for two-way audio with some cameras, and the Hubitat Elevation C8 can serve as a hub for local automation.
For HomeKit, you’ll need a camera that supports HomeKit integration, such as the Apple HomePod Mini or the Reolink Argus 4 Pro. These cameras can be added to your HomeKit setup and controlled through the Home app.
For Hubitat, you can use a Hubitat Elevation C8 to integrate with local cameras and other smart devices. This allows for more advanced automation and control without relying on cloud services.
Real Tradeoffs You Should Consider
Before making the switch, it’s important to understand the tradeoffs. Local cameras require more setup and maintenance than cloud-based systems. They also depend on your local network being stable and secure.
Another consideration is the cost. While local cameras can be more expensive upfront, they offer long-term benefits in terms of privacy and control. You’ll also need to invest in a reliable NAS or storage solution if you’re using local storage.
Quick Verdict
Replacing Arlo with fully local cameras is a solid choice if you’re building a local-first smart home. While it requires more setup and maintenance, the benefits in terms of privacy, control, and reliability are worth it. Home Assistant is an excellent platform for integrating local cameras, and with the right setup, you can have a fully functional security system that works entirely on your network.